Newton's 3 Laws of Motion!

ARE WE MOVING?

• When I think of moving, I just think of everyday movements that I and everyone else do. But is it true that we are always moving? What IS movement anyways??

• To start our understanding of Newton's 3 Laws of Motion, we did a lab with Hover Discs and drew interaction diagrams to further understand the different types of forces than can act on an object.

• When we turned on the Hover Discs, Newton's 1st Law of Motion was clearly demonstrated because it stayed at a constant speed unless a net force acted on it. We also did a Fan Cart Lab which is demonstrated in the picture below:

• We were already told that acceleration is a change in velocity over a change in time and that acceleration is the slop in a velocity vs time graph. 

• In this Fan Cart Lab, we were able to conclude that a net force is required to accelerate a massive object (Fnet=ma). This is also called Newton's 1st Law of Motion.

• We also concluded that the amount an object accelerates depends on the object's mass and the net force it experiences. In other words, if an object has a lot of mass, like a Hummer Limo, will require more force on it in order for it to accelerate in comparison to a feather, which will only require a very small amount of force in order to accelerate. This concept is also known as Newton's 2nd Law of Motion!

• Newton's 3rd Law of Motion is a little more tricky. Instead of explaining this law with the experiment that we did in class, let's look at a worksheet problem instead. In the situation below, a person is falling towards the Earth so the only force they have between them is gravitational force (Fg). The person is experiencing gravitational force in the downward direction towards Earth. The Earth is experiencing an EQUAL but OPPOSITE force because of the person. But how is this possible that the huge planet that we live on, and an individual's mass can have the same force acting on them? The reason this makes sense is because the Earth is SO massive, that it's ACCELERATION is very very very small. But once a human, in comparison to the Earth, has such a SMALL mass, his or her ACCELERATION is very very very big. 

• With all this talk of acceleration and force, it made me wonder about the initial question of this unit... ARE WE MOVING?

• Newton was able to prove that this concept of "movement" does not exist. He said that movement has to be measured with respect to something else. So when you get out of bed in the morning and walk down the hallway to brush your teeth, yes you are moving.. with respect to the shelves on your wall and to the floor you walk on and everything else in your house that remains still. 

• Going back to Newton's 1st Law of Motion, a force causes an object to ACCELERATE, not MOVE.

REAL WORLD EXAMPLE: Can we connect Newton's 3 Laws of Motion to Field Hockey?

1st Law of Motion: During a field hockey game, the ball starts in the middle of the field and depending on who has possession, one player will pass the ball to her teammate and then continue with gameplay. Before the whistle is blown and no one touches the ball, the ball remains in one place because there is no outside force exerted on it (except for gravity which is the reason it is on the ground and normal force because the ball is touching the Earth).

2nd Law of Motion: Once the whistle blows and the player passes the ball, the amount of force exerted on the ball by the player will determine how far the ball travels. Also, when players are fighting for the ball, there is usually a good ampount of body contact. Sometimes players run into eachother. The player with the larger amount of mass will experience a smaller acceleration during the collision of the two players while the player with a smaller mass might fall down or bounce off more. 

3rd Law of Motion: When these two players collide, they both will experience the same amount of force. Even though the less massive player fell over, it is just because the other player was more massive so experienced a smaller acceleration. 

Impulse Lab

• In this weeks lab, we did an experiment to answer the question What is the relationship between impulse, force, and time during a collision?
• Before the lab, we knew that impulse (J) can be defined as a change in momentum (p_after - p_before).
• Our general procedures of the lab started by crashing an empty cart into the force-probe attatched to the ring stand. we then recorded the carts velocity before the collision and then after the collision. These points are shown in the bottom half of the picture below. Then we found the area under the Force vs. Time graph by highlighting the green trianguar shape shown below.

• Then we calculated the impulse of the cart and this work is shown in the whiteboard that we did in class below. 

• We were also asked how the impulse and the area under the Force vs Time graph compare? By comparing the integral (area of the proabola) and the impulse that we calculated, we saw that after considering there may be minor error in our experiment, that the integral and impulse are the SAME! From this information, we went through the following process to derive the equation below.

• We also noticed that the impulse on an object in a collision is constant. This means that force and time are inversely proportional. Forces are equal and opposite.

• This just sounds like a bunch of useless scientific facts, but it actually really makes sense. In field hockey, one is supposed to "give with the ball" when they receive it. This means that when someone passes to you, you don't just stick out your stick because then the ball will bounce off and will no longer be in your possession. By increasing the time before the ball and stick make contact, the force of both decrease. See this in action in the video below!

Collisions Lab: Momentum

• In this weeks lab, we measured the patterns in velocity when two things collide. we did this by having two carts, both .25 kg, collide with each other. We did trials with elastic, and inelastic collisions. For the elastic collision, the cart's spring launchers were facing each other which made them bounce away from each other after they collided. During the inelastic collision, the cart's Velcro ends were facing each other, causing them to stick together and stop moving. A picture of our inelastic collision, BEFORE the collision, is shown below:

We defined momentum as mass in   motion, giving us the equation: p=mv

• After we calculated everything and filled out the chart to the right, we were asked to find the amount of Momentum (p) and Kinetic Energy(KE or just K) that was lost during the collision to our surroundings.
• For the elastic collision, 19.61% of the kinetic energy was lost to surroundings, and only 1.71% of momentum was lost! In the inelastic collision, more kinetic energy was lost compared to momentum as well. 
• From this, we concluded that in a collision, energy is often lost to the surroundings, but momentum is conserved. 
• P total before=P total after

ENDURING QUESTION:

• Why is it that in the inelastic collision, the carts came to a standstill when they collided?

Remember above when i said that momentum is conserved, therefore the momentum before and after a collision are the same? Well if we break down momentum (p) into mass (m) times velocity (v), and recognize that a cart moving to the right has a positive momentum, and a cart moving to the left has a negative momentum, we could conclude something like the picture below: 

REAL-WORLD CONNECTION:

This lab made me think of playing pool, considering there is more than one ball and they collide on the table all the time. If i were to hit a pool ball with my pool stick, this ball would have momentum. Then when this ball is moving across the pool table with a certain velocity and collides with another pool ball, both of these balls now have momentum because the momentum from the first ball was transferred and conserved.  Considering these balls are not going to stick together, the balls will most likely move apart from each other. 

Cart Launcher Lab

BIG QUESTION: How are energy and velocity related?

• In this lab, we did an experiment and used our data points to derive an equation relating energy and velocity.

• We used a photogate sensor to record the launched cart's velocity. The set up of our experiment is shown in the following clip: 

• We repeated this step using different distances to pull the cart back and recorded the velocity.

• After we had all our accurate data, we used a graphing app to graph our points. This Graph looks like this:

• Knowing the mass of the glider is about .4 kg, we were able to conclude that the slope of our line is 1/2 of the mass of the glider. with this information, we were able to derive an equation using Energy, Mass, and Velocity. Starting with the simple equaionof a line, y=mx+b, and the information from our graph, we derived the equation E=1/2mv^2. Since the energy we are talking about is the energy of movement, we substituted E (energy) for KE (kinetic energy).

• The energy that we give the rubber band by pulling it back, is transferred to the cart which creates it to move. 

REAL WORLD CONNECTION:

• The idea of movement in this lab made me think back to the example of hitting a field hockey ball that I referred to in my first post, Mass vs. Force. When I use a force over the distance of my field hockey stick, I create energy. This energy is then transferred to the ball, which makes the ball move really fast, and create a noise.

Rubber Band Lab

BIG Questions

1. "How can we store energy to do work for us later?"
2. “How does the force it takes to stretch a rubber band depend on the 
   AMOUNT by which you stretch it?” 

• In this lab, we used a series of procedures using a rubber band and an electronic force probe to derive an equation for potential energy.

• First we stretched the rubber band a certain disrance andmeasured the force ittook to hold the rubber band in the stretched position. A picture of how this looked -->

• From the input of distance and output of force, we came up with a data table that looked like this <--

• The two trials were just for accuracy, and we tested the force needed to pull the rubber band when it had just one loop, and also a double loop. 

• Then from this data, we graphed the points of the single loop data and drew a best fit line throught them. after finding the slop of our best fit line (77. 65 N/kg), we started to think of the components of our data and graph in terms of the equation of a line, y=mx+b. From this we derived Fs=kx9(+0)

• Since we know the area under a force vs. distance graph is always the energy, we plugged in the force needed to strength the rubber band, and distance stretched into the equation A=1/2b - h. From this, we derived E= 1/2x - Fs. (we were able to do this just by substituting what our graph was labeled, for what the generic area equation called for.)  Because we know Us=1/2b - h, we can start plugging things in and we get our final equation which is Us= 1/2kx^2. These prodecures are shown below:

• Because of this data and these equations, we can define potential energy as stored energy that does work for us at a later time.

A Real World Connection

• This lab made me think about all the different things that store energy that release that energy at a later time. For instance, a bow and arrow. Once in place, you pull the arrow back. Once you release the force you were aplying, the arrow uses its energy and shoots forward. 

▽▲▼△Pyramid Lab△▼▽▲

BIG QUESTION: IS THE PRODUCT OF FORCE AND DISTANCE UNIVERSALLY CONSERVED?

• As an introduction to this lab, we watched a video regarding the egyptian pyramids and how the egyptians were able to build the highest points of the pyramids. this video is featured here -->

• The idea in this video of using the simple machine of an internal ramp to lift the heavy blocks is very smart, but unproven. So WE tried to prove it ourselves!

• No we cannot prove whether the Egyptians used a ramp in our physics class, but we sure can prove that using a ramp over a shorter or longer distance will both have the same WORK because energy, or the ability to do work, is UNIVERSALLY CONSERVED. 

• We did two trials to prove this. We used toy car, a ramp that was about 8 cm tall, and an electronic force probe to do this experiment. I represented our data in the chart below:

<-- SAME WORK!!

• An awesome real-world connection I thought of is based at the facility I did my core project, Halleck Creek Ranch. Halleck Creek Ranch is a therapeutic horseback riding facility for people with all sorts of different disabilities. Most of the riders are not able to get out of their wheel chair, therefor they use a rap to wheel them to the height of the horses back! This ramp enables us to use a less amount of force, over a greater distance, but the same amount of energy. 

Simple Machines: Pulley Lab

• In this weeks lab, we made a pulley system to figure out how simple machines help us in our everyday life. But before we made anything, we measured how much force it takes to manually life a 200 gram (.2kg) brass mass 10 cm or .1 meters. To life the brass mass .1 meters, it takes 2 Newtons of force. 

• THEN we made the double pulley machine that is in the picture below. We used a ruler to measure 10cm from the surface of the table, and an electronic force probe to get a very specific reading on how much force is exerted while using a simple machine. 

• When we pulled the force probe down until the brass mass was 10 cm off the table, the probe read that it only took .9 Newtons! That's weird though isn't it? Just by using a simple machine, the amount of force needed was cut just about in half. How is this possible?

The Trade-Off

• Instead of just using your hand to pick up the brass mass off of the table and using 2 Newtons, the simple machine only uses .9 Newtons but also needed 20 centimeters of string in order or get the other string that had the brass mass attached to it off of the table. 

• SO the trade-off for using a simple machine rather than manual force is that you use less force over a greater area of distance. Meaning, if you increase the distance, you can decrease the force.

• Taking a look at our whiteboard, we also were able to figure out tat distance and force when represented by numbers, are reciprocals or inversely proportional. 

• Although it is not super clearly represented in our chart, the shaded portion of both squares, or their area's are the same. This shaded area in a force vs. distance graph is called the ENERGY (J). No matter wether one uses their manual force or the force of a simple machine, the two processes will both have the same energy.

• We call the energy transferred over a distance WORK (J). 

• Using the knowledge of our graphed date and the general equation of the area of a surface helped us derive our next big physics equation which i have illustrated below: 

• A real-world connection of the idea of this whole experiment would be the use of curtain drawstrings. instead of applying force directly to the curtains and trying to get them perfectly to their designated sides, one may use a draw string instead (like the ones we have at SI) to make their lives easier because they wont have to use as much force. 

 <-- MORE FORCE

                                       LESS FORCE -->

SAME ENERGY!

Mass vs. Force

• This week in Physics class, we learned about the relationship between force and mass. Not only did the class learn about it, but we actually also wrote Newton's Second law by using our own knowledge of our data and the general equation of a line, y=mx+b. Yes, WE wrote it.

• Using manual and electronic force probes, we measured the amount of force (N) needed to hold up a brass mass of varied masses (kg). After recording our results, we drew a graph using the data and drew a best fit line through the points. 

• Once the graph was drawn, the relationship between mass and force became MUCH clearer. The best fit line obviously showed us that the more mass an object had, the more force the probe exerted.  

•  I was reminded of the difference between mass and weight. The brass masses that we used in our experiment all had different masses meaning the heavier ones had more mass- aka they were "made up of more stuff." BUT the difference between that and the weight of an object is that the weight is the amount of gravity that is needed to basically keep something from floating away. If that still doesnt make sense, take a look at this more thorough video on the difference between mass and weight: 

                          

• Knowing the general equation of a line (y=mx+b), we plugged in specific numbers according to our graph. After simplifying, we derived the equation f=mg. 

•  In f=mg, "f" stands for the force of gravity. from our experiment, we learned that the force of gravity on Earth (f, Newtons) is about 10 times the mass of an object (m, kg). 

•  The "g" in the equation stands for the gravitational constant aka the slope of any force vs. mass graph. 

•  A connection from this experiment could be made to the sport of field hockey. Just while running on the field, a player's body is exerting a force against the force of gravity so they can move at fast speeds. i have found that the most force is exerted on the ball when a player push passes or hits the ball. 

• As you can see in the video below, the player uses the force of his backswing which he gets from his arms and torso to hit the ball. the amount of force can be seen by the distance and power that the ball travels.